Blog Post

What if 90% of the peer-reviewed clinical research is exaggerated, or worse, completely false?

Posted to Gurteen Knowledge-Log by David Gurteen on 27 March 2013

Title	What if 90% of the peer-reviewed clinical research is exaggerated, or worse, completely false?
Weblog	Gurteen Knowledge Log
Knowledge Letter	Appears in the Gurteen Knowledge Letter issue: 153
Posted Date	Wednesday 27 March 2013 12:27 GMT
Posted By	David Gurteen
Links	http://tv.greenmedinfo.com/ben-goldacre-ted-med-2012-industr ... http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/evidence-based-medicine-coi ... http://youtu.be/JKRIoY9aXK8 ...

What if 90% of the peer-reviewed clinical research, the holy grail of the conventional medical system, is exaggerated, or worse, completely false?

A scary thought! And what about other peer-reviewed material? See Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals and Problems with Peer-Review: A Brief Summary

If you are interested in Knowledge Management, the Knowledge Café or the role of conversation in organizational life then you my be interested in this online book I am writing on Conversational Leadership

David Gurteen

How to contact me

My Blog

Gurteen Knowledge Community

The Gurteen Knowledge Community is a global learning community of over 21,000 people in 160 countries across the world.

The community is for people who are committed to making a difference: people who wish to share and learn from each other and who strive to see the world differently, think differently and act differently.

Membership of the Gurteen Knowledge Community is free.

Knowledge Community

Thursday 21 November 2024
08:58 AM GMT